Hi,
Sorry, I guess I was a bit confused when you said it retained it. I thought you meant it retained the loader information, (so you didn't have to recreate the loader) not that it retained the actual image data. If you already retain the image data inside the SWF then it certainly sounds like a cache to me! Very cool! If I may ask, how do you retain the image data and does that have any significant negative effects on memory usage when a large amount of images are "cached"?
Thanks for the quick response! You are doing some excellent work!
Cheers,
Bill