_larry_

ok !!!!, thank's man

That's a clear answer my friend, great Anyway I'll start to recode my site using you'r technique. Actually I'm doing test on a little WindowsPhone Lumia 620, and perfs are not to bad. Thank's a lot one more Rodrigo, you'r the best !!!! Larry

Well, it seems to be exactly what I wanted to do ... Very very very cool , thank's a lot for your help I'll try to implement this on my codepen and re-publish it. There is one thing I don't understand, why all of your's wrapper have to be "overflow:hidden" ? Don't you think that create a Draggable instance on the whole page (to get the scrollTop on it) , I mean the "wrapper" will cost a lot on the CPU ? Larry

Hi Rodrigo ! Well, I think you've post your reply 1seconde before I update mine ! , I've just updated it with an example on CodePen. Thanks for the CodePen Template to , sure I'll use it if I encounter another problem's. Just to re-explaine with my poor English : If you open my codePen on small screen and the View takes the whole screen, as the draggable instance is locked on the X Axis, there is no way to scroll up and down the html page, and I don't know how to find an alternative to this ? or maybe the things I've wrote at the end of my updated post .... Larry

Hello all Well, imagine there an basic html page with header and a content on a small screen (mobile or tablet). - The content element is highter than the screen, so to see full content you have to scroll down the page, and up to rich the top of the page. - The content element is an Draggable instance, is locked on the x axis, and then user can swap left or right to change the content ... with nice gs animation (great:). - My probleme is : when user srcoll down enougth to see only the content element on screen, there is no way to scroll or implement touchEvent to scroll down or up the whole html page ? arg ? Well I don't know how to solve this ? UPDATE : I've made a codepen to illustrate this. Just scroll down to the content view to get it in full screen on mobile device or little browser window... I've just read this post to, like carl schooff said : I'm really not sure what we can do in the API to "sometimes intercept the intereaction with the Draggable and initiate a page scroll" Well, I was just hoping that there where a properties to do that.... instead of doing crappy hacking things. Let me know if I'm wrong, but the only solution I found is to reduce de Draggable instance width and height , and let the user the possibility to scroll up and down the html page by touching the screen where the the Draggable instance is not. Like a colon left and a colon right .... Or just create a "Draggable Zone" on top and bottom of my html page .... _larry_

Wahou, first , thank's a lot for this so rapid response Hum, hum , I was afraid of this, sadly it's a browser render problem .... well I was hoping that I've missed some important code to get my animation smoother, but not.... As I come from the Flash platform, it's very very hard to see so simple animation rendered no very well, but as i read somewhere in this forum , i'll use Canvas ot SVG for smoother more or less complex animations. I Wish FireFox get better very soon, and wish that the whole internet user in the world get the latest browser for nice animation render made by GSAP the next week , what a wish ...... thank's again Larry

Hello All First i would like to say that GSAP is wonderfull, after using it for 5 years in my every-day job doing Full AS3 site, then I start using it in my new challenges in html5. Well, i've read some post about this , but no one seem's to see jerky tween animation on Firefox. My conf : Windows 8 and the last version of GSAP (beta 1.8.2), in this exemple i'm using TweenMax.to, with 30 frs. an the last firefox( 18.0.1 ). exemple here ! Well, when i say "Jerky" my feeling is that is no to bad but when i compare it with Chrome or event IExplorer 10 , the firefox verson isn't very clean ... And it's also when i see the GS demo on the site (this page) on the same OS & Browser (Firefox) it's look very very more greater and fluid. Thank's for comment Larry